Arnold Williams (notebuyer) wrote,
Arnold Williams

  • Mood:

Why Inheritance Taxes Have No Real Constituency

Instapundit has the key point:

Graetz & Shapiro want to understand how the political culture shifted from one in which people thought that wealthy people ought to support the society that made their wealth possible, to one in which people hope to get rich enough to worry about inheritance taxes, and thus take a preemptive dislike to them.

I think that one difference may be that society does less to "make it possible" for people to get wealthy now. A hundred years ago, or even fifty, the politics of inheritance taxes were different. But then the government mostly defended the country and engaged in various public-good activities, like building roads or supporting research. There was pork, and income transfer, of course, but it was a much smaller part of the picture. So the notion that one was "giving back" to a system that made wealth possible made some sense.

Now much of the government's taxing-and-spending is about transferring money from one group to another. The "give back" point is much weaker, because the system isn't about public goods, but about payouts that are (usually) driven by interest-group politics rather than the common good. So the moral claim for inheritance taxes would seem to be a lot weaker, and maybe it's no surprise that many people see it that way.

On the other hand, as the book also looks at political tactics, let me suggest that "fuck the small businessman" is a poor slogan for those favoring inheritance taxes.

I think he's right.

  • Working Class, Despised Class: A Study in Synonymy

    I return to an issue which some people have taken issue with me about. That is the issue of class. I continue to believe that a well-dressed white…

  • Secession

    Some people seem not to have noticed that the civil war was fought over "union" and whether citizens were citizens of the federal government as well…

  • British Government Seeking Your DNA

    For its public database, the British government wants the DNA of everybody -- including tourists. Think of it as a new spot on the entrance form.…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded