Arnold Williams (notebuyer) wrote,
Arnold Williams


An article from the Mail says that moderns are about one standard deviation less intelligent than Victorians.

While it bases its test on reflex time, I'd suggest that a simpler demonstration of the same thing is the everyday vocabulary employed in novels and popular non-fiction. It is much larger, full of reference to standard works (Book of Common Prayer, Shakespeare, King James Bible, Pilgrim's Progress &c. &c.) most of which are now considered too difficult for highschool, which remains the final degree for the majority of the population. Thomas Hardy, Anthony Trollope, and George Meredith were major novelists, though the standard was Dickens. Thomas Carlyle is one of the most enjoyable non-fiction writers. In the US, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry James would be his opposite numbers. Take a moment and try them out. My trick is to have a pocket dictionary nearby, and make a pencil mark every time I have to look up a word: if I see something with 4 or more, I take time to write it out for myself. There may be other tricks that work as well when facing unfamiliar vocabulary.

What's discouraging about this is the direction of the change over time, and how poorly it is reflected in our popular understanding of ourselves. Reality. It takes work.
Tags: fiction, intelligence, victorian

  • Summing up....

    "Patriot Post US" occasionally has the most fun with news...

  • The Constitution and "Reasonableness"

    Reid et al. are looking into regulating burning Korans. Because some obscure guy burned one and some loony people (Muslims, not condemned by other…

  • Airlines: It was a nice trip.

    Inspired by this piece, and the letter from UCSF about problems with radiation in TSA applications and the incapacity of TSA to distinguish what…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded