Arnold Williams (notebuyer) wrote,
Arnold Williams
notebuyer

Still Wrong

It is a matter of some amazement to me that the "scholars" spend their time translating a text which is no more than a decade old, while criticizing the translators of the KJV for relying on "a few recent manuscripts". That the manuscript they cite are wildly in conflict with each other, and only preserved because no one used them doesn't matter: for a scholar, a defective manuscript is good for many articles, while the correct one might command assent, which doesn't lead to tenure.

Let's see what that looks like for Dallas Theological Seminary's "NET Bible":

Tags: bible, kjv, scholarship
Subscribe

  • Ten Unpopular True Thoughts, With Reactions

    The contest in the coffee shop was simple: what are some true, but unpopular thoughts? 1. Some women like the thought of becoming mothers and are…

  • Why People Hate Feminism

    As it turns out, everybody's stereotype of a feminist is correct, as most stereotypes are. Pretending that "it's just about equality", for example,…

  • Why Science Discourages Kids

    Because they pay attention to Carl Sagan, and others like him. If all you see is that anything you do doesn’t matter, there goes any reason to do…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments